Compare

Five ways to handle disputes. One starts before the sale closes.

Absorb the loss, build a team, bolt on a representment vendor, subscribe to alerts, or build the evidence at the sale. What each one does, what it costs, and what it cannot do. No vendor is named; the categories are what matter.

Schedule a demoSee pricing
Absorb the lossIn-house dispute teamRepresentment vendorNetwork alert serviceChargeSecured
When it actsNeverAfter the dispute landsAfter the dispute landsHours after the cardholder calls the bank, before the chargeback postsAt the sale, then again when a dispute lands
Evidence at dispute timeWhatever your systems keptWhatever your systems kept, gathered by hand across POS, delivery, and support toolsWhatever your systems kept, gathered by the vendor from your exportsNone needed; you refundThe record built at the sale: cardholder, purchase, understanding, fulfillment, recipient
Who does the workNobodyYour staff: deadlines, retrieval, packaging, filingThe vendor, on a per-case basisYou, by refunding inside the alert windowChargeSecured assembles and files; your staff reviews and approves
What it costs$128 in combined cost per chargeback, plus the reversed sale and the goods$82 in internal labor per case, plus tools and the $46 in feesPer-case fees or a share of recoveries, plus the $46 in third-party fees; varies by vendorA fee per alert, plus the refunded sale3¢ per transaction, or 0.2 to 0.4% or 0.6 to 0.8% of the sale by band; processing at cost
Effect on your dispute ratioRises uncheckedUnchanged: a won representment is still a chargeback in the ratioUnchanged, for the same reasonLowered, at the cost of the saleLowered at the source: disclosure, acknowledgement, and verification deter the claims that would have been filed
What it cannot doAnythingChange what happened at the saleChange what happened at the saleKeep the saleDecide the outcome. Issuers and networks decide; no win rate is guaranteed

Cost figures: $128 combined and $46 third-party fees per chargeback (Mastercard, 2025); $82 internal cost per case (Mastercard and Javelin, 2026). See Data for sources. Vendor and alert pricing varies and is described generically.

Where each one stops.

Representment tools

Good at filing. Blind before the sale.

A representment vendor or an in-house team can only work with the evidence your systems happened to keep. If the receipt is a card slip and the delivery record is a text message, that is the case. Winning also does not remove the chargeback from your ratio.

Alert services

Good for the ratio. Bad for the sale.

An alert lets you refund before the chargeback is filed, so the ratio stays clean. The cardholder keeps the goods and the money. For a merchant with many small first-party claims, that is a subsidy paid to the people making them.

ChargeSecured

Prevents, deters, records, answers.

Disclosure and acknowledgement close off the easy claims. Verification above your threshold deters the rest. The record is built while the sale happens, and the response is filed from it. What it does not do is decide: issuers do.

How it works →

Bring last quarter's disputes. We'll show where each one would have started.

Schedule a demoFind your band

Charge Secured LLC is not a bank, payment processor, insurer, or law firm. Chargeback outcomes are determined by card issuers and networks. No win rate or recovery is guaranteed.